File list
This special page shows all uploaded files.
| Date | Name | Thumbnail | Size | User | Description | Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10:49, 25 April 2019 | 2007-NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards.pdf (file) |  |
6.05 MB | Debra Tabron | NIOSH, 2007. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. US Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2005-149. | 1 |
| 09:18, 16 April 2019 | 2018-USEPA. Remedial Technology Fact Sheet.pdf (file) | |
915 KB | Debra Tabron | USEPA, 2018. Remedial Technology Fact Sheet — Activated Carbon-Based Technology for In Situ Remediation. EPA 542-f-18-001 | 1 |
| 08:40, 5 April 2019 | Weaver1w2fig2c.png (file) |  |
584 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2, Panel C: Vertical separation distance from LNAPL petroleum contamination. | 1 |
| 08:38, 5 April 2019 | Weaver1w2fig2b.png (file) |  |
426 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2, Panel B: Vertical separation distance from aqueous phase petroleum contamination. | 1 |
| 08:37, 5 April 2019 | Weaver1w2fig2a.png (file) |  |
479 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2, Panel A: Lateral separation distance from petroleum contamination. | 1 |
| 08:31, 5 April 2019 | Weaver1w2fig1.png (file) |  |
598 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 1 Typical conceptual models for vapor intrusion from a release of petroleum hydrocarbons (such as a fuel spill) and for a release of chlorinated volatile organic compounds | 1 |
| 13:02, 4 April 2019 | 2009-Davis- Bioattenuation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Vapors in the Subsurface.pdf (file) | |
789 KB | Debra Tabron | Davis, R.V. 2009. Bioattenuation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Vapors in the Subsurface: Update on Recent Studies and Proposed Screening Criteria for the Vapor‐Intrusion Pathway. LUSTLine Bulletin 61:11‐14. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control... | 1 |
| 12:53, 4 April 2019 | 2013-USEPA-Evaluation of Empirical Data to Support soil Vapor intrusion Screening Criteria.pdf (file) | |
2.71 MB | Debra Tabron | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2013. Evaluation of Empirical Data to Support Soil Vapor Intrusion Screening Criteria for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Compounds. Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. EPA 510-R-13-001. Report pdf. | 1 |
| 10:51, 4 April 2019 | 2012b-USEPA-An Approach for Dev. Site-Specific Lateral and Vertical Inclusion Zones....pdf (file) | |
2.87 MB | Debra Tabron | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2012. An Approach for developing site-specific lateral and vertical inclusion zones within which structures should be evaluated for petroleum vapor intrusion due to releases of motor fuel from underground s... | 1 |
| 09:44, 2 April 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig7A 2.png (file) |  |
698 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 7A. Schematic of the DPP (not to scale). | 1 |
| 09:44, 21 March 2019 | GreenTank.mp4 (file) | 2.15 MB | Jhurley | Dye tank simulation of matrix diffusion. | 1 | |
| 15:26, 6 March 2019 | 2000-Yeh-Hydraulic Tomography..Development of a new aquifer test method.pdf (file) | |
1.37 MB | Debra Tabron | Yeh, T.C.J., and S. Liu. 2000. Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resources Research 36, no. 8: 2095-2105. | 1 |
| 13:37, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig9C.png (file) |  |
56 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 9C. Comparison of NMR and DPP ''K'' estimates at two GEMS locations. The dash lines show the range of the NMR ''K'' estimates due to the uncertainty in the empirical parameters used in the pore size - ''K'' relationship. (Knight et al., 2016) | 1 |
| 13:36, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig9B.png (file) |  |
113 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 9B. NMR responses as a function of pore size, where ''A'' is the initial magnetization, T<sub>2</sub> is NMR relaxation time. (Grunewald et al., 2011) | 1 |
| 13:35, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig9A.png (file) |  |
88 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 9A. Measurement domain around a NMR borehole probe. | 1 |
| 13:34, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig8.png (file) |  |
39 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 8. Comparison of DPP and DP multilevel slug test ''K'' profiles at GEMS. The slug test profile is located 2 m northwest of DPP profile 1, and 2 m southeast of DPP profile 2. (Butler, 2005) | 1 |
| 13:33, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig7B.png (file) |  |
123 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 7B. Example DPP test sequence at GEMS (Liu et al., 2012) | 1 |
| 13:31, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig6C.png (file) |  |
81 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 6C. Six example DPIL (red curve) ''K'' profiles calibrated by collocated Direct Push Permeameter tests (blue bars) at the MacroDispersion Experiment (MADE) site, Columbus, MS. The dashed curves represent the upper ''K'' limit for continuous DPIL... | 1 |
| 13:30, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig6B.png (file) |  |
44 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 6B. Artistic rendering of the HPT (continuous DPIL probe combined with an EC Wenner array) (Lessoff et al., 2010). | 1 |
| 13:29, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig6A.png (file) |  |
64 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 6A. Schematic of the DPIL with a screen attached to the probe rod at its lower end (Liu et al., 2012). | 1 |
| 13:27, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig5.png (file) |  |
75 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 5. Schematic diagram showing the borehole flowmeter profiling procedure (Molz et al., 1989). | 1 |
| 13:21, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig4.png (file) |  |
59 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 4. Schematic illustrating hydrostratigraphic profiling, the combination of electrical conductivity (EC) and multilevel slug test profiling (Sellwood et al., 2005). | 1 |
| 13:20, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig3.png (file) |  |
49 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 3. ''K'' estimates from different field methods at GEMS (Butler, 2005). Well DW is located 2 m east of GEMS4S. | 1 |
| 13:18, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig2B.png (file) |  |
58 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2B. Example data plot from a multilevel slug test at GEMS. Test is initiated by sudden depressurization of a pressurized air column | 1 |
| 13:18, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig2A.png (file) |  |
271 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2A. Schematic of a falling-head slug test (water flows from well into aquifer) performed in a multi-level slug-test system. Head change is introduced in standpipe, which is directly connected to the interval isolated by the straddle packers (not... | 1 |
| 13:09, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Fig1.png (file) |  |
12 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 1. Schematic of Darcy’s Law flow experiment. | 1 |
| 13:08, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq6.png (file) |  |
6 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 13:07, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq5.png (file) |  |
4 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 13:05, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq4.png (file) |  |
7 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 13:04, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq3.png (file) |  |
4 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 13:04, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq2.png (file) |  |
4 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 13:03, 5 March 2019 | Liu1w2 Eq1.png (file) |  |
3 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:49, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig5.png (file) |  |
126 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:48, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig4.png (file) |  |
57 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:48, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig3.png (file) |  |
115 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:47, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig2.png (file) |  |
75 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:46, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig1b.png (file) |  |
453 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:44, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Fig1a.png (file) |  |
202 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 1. Batch reactor experiments (a, top) to generate points on a sorption isotherm (b). Part (a) shows two samples prepared in duplicate with soil-free control vials and vials to verify the contaminant mass added to the systems. Part (b) shows lin... | 1 |
| 16:43, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq6.png (file) |  |
5 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:42, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq5.png (file) |  |
8 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:41, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq4.png (file) |  |
6 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:39, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq3.png (file) |  |
18 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:39, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq2.png (file) |  |
6 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 16:37, 18 February 2019 | Allen-King1w2 Eq1.png (file) |  |
5 KB | Debra Tabron | 1 | |
| 15:27, 18 February 2019 | 1990-Piwoni-Basic concepts sorption haz site EPA 540-4-90-053.pdf (file) | |
45 KB | Debra Tabron | Piwoni, M.D., and Keeley, J.W., 1990. Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at Hazardous Waste Sites. USEPA, Ground Water Issue, EPA/540/4-90/053. | 1 |
| 12:27, 11 February 2019 | Hatzinger1w2 Fig4.png (file) |  |
1,017 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 4. Field-Scale In Situ Propane Biosparging System | 1 |
| 12:26, 11 February 2019 | Hatzinger1w2 Fig3.png (file) |  |
303 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 3. Layout of biosparging system<ref name= "Hatzinger2015"/>. | 1 |
| 12:24, 11 February 2019 | Hatzinger1w2 Fig2.png (file) |  |
390 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 2. Field-Scale Propane-Fed FBR | 1 |
| 12:23, 11 February 2019 | Hatzinger1w2 Fig1.png (file) |  |
19 KB | Debra Tabron | Figure 1. NDMA chemical structure | 1 |
| 10:04, 11 February 2019 | 2014-USEPA-N-Nitrosodimethylamine fact sheet.pdf (file) | |
118 KB | Debra Tabron | USEPA. 2014. Technical Fact Sheet - N-Nitroso-dimethylamine. USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 505-F-14-005. | 1 |
