File list

Jump to: navigation, search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
 
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size User Description Versions
09:09, 7 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 1r.jpg (file) 12 KB Debra Tabron Chuck Newell - Article 1 - Equation 1 1
15:43, 6 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Table2r.jpg (file) 103 KB Debra Tabron Table 2. Mobile Porosity Estimates from Tracer Tests 1
15:38, 6 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Table1r.jpg (file) 138 KB Debra Tabron Table 1. Representative Values of Total Porosity (n), Effective Porosity (ne), and Hydraulic Conductivity (K) for Different Aquifer Materials 1
13:52, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 2.jpg (file) 36 KB Debra Tabron Since Darcy’s time, there has been a significant variation of Darcy’s Law which is used to calculate the actual velocity that the groundwater is moving, such as meters traveled per year. This quantity is called “interstitial velocity” or “see... 1
13:50, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Equation 1.jpg (file) 58 KB Debra Tabron In unconsolidated geologic settings (gravel, sand, silt, and clay) and highly fractured systems, the rate of groundwater movement can be expressed using Darcy’s Law. This law is a fundamental mathematical relationship in the groundwater field and can... 1
13:41, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig4.JPG (file) 89 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4. Difference between Darcy Velocity (also called Specific Discharge) and Seepage Velocity (also called Interstitial Velocity). 1
13:39, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig3..JPG (file) 51 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3: Conceptual explanation of Darcy’s Law based on Darcy’s experiment. Adapted from course notes developed by Dr. R.J. Mitchell (Western Washington University). 1
13:37, 2 September 2016 Newell-Article 1-Fig2.jpg (file) 469 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2. Hydraulic Conductivity of Selected Rocks (from Heath, 1983). 1
16:41, 1 September 2016 Heath-1983-Basic groundwater hydrology water supply paper.pdf (file) 13.1 MB Debra Tabron Heath, R.C., 1983. Basic ground-water hydrology, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2220, 86p. 1
15:04, 30 August 2016 Krug-Article 1. Table1 perchlorate.PNG (file) 31 KB Debra Tabron Table 1. Perchlorate Physical and Chemical Properties 1
15:03, 30 August 2016 Krug-article 1. Fig2 Biodegradation Pathways.PNG (file) 232 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2: Biodegradation Pathways for Perchlorate 1
15:00, 30 August 2016 Krug-Article 1. Fig1 perchlorate.jpg (file) 1.88 MB Debra Tabron Figure 1: Perchlorate Releases and Drinking Water Detections 1
09:58, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 11.PNG (file) 159 KB Debra Tabron Figure 11: OIP log with EC plotted on left, % area of fluorescence plotted on the right graph (shaded). Example of a captured image displaying fluorescence (mid-right) and analysis of the image used to determine % area of fluorescence below. Fuel pro... 1
09:57, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 10.PNG (file) 14 KB Debra Tabron Figure 10: Schematic of the OIP Probe. 1
09:55, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 9.PNG (file) 34 KB Debra Tabron Figure 9: An MIP log, l to r: EC log, XSD, PID and FID detector responses versus depth identifying presence and levels of VOC contamination. 1
09:53, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 8.PNG (file) 21 KB Debra Tabron Figure 8: Schematic of MIP depicting principles of operation. 1
09:50, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 7.PNG (file) 75 KB Debra Tabron Figure 7: An HPT log with EC on left, injection pressure in middle, and flow rate on right. Note good agreement between the EC and HPT pressure logs. Mostly coarse grained below 29 ft with 2 clay layers defined. See also Fig. 5. 1
09:46, 29 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 6.PNG (file) 24 KB Debra Tabron Figure 6: Schematic of an HPT probe. 1
16:14, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 5.PNG (file) 50 KB Debra Tabron Figure 5: A typical EC log with rate of penetration (ROP) plotted on left and bulk formation EC on right. The decrease in EC and ROP at ~29ft indicates transition to coarser grained materials (sands). 1
16:13, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 4.PNG (file) 36 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4: A Wenner array probe (top) and a dipole array built into an MIP probe. 1
16:12, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 3.PNG (file) 93 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3: A CPTu log displaying l to r: lithologic graph based on log interpretation, tip resistance, sleeve friction, pore pressure and friction ratio. 1
16:11, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 2.PNG (file) 10 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2: A CPT cone (left) and piezocone (right) with porous ring. 1
16:10, 26 August 2016 McCall Article 3 Figure 1.PNG (file) 58 KB Debra Tabron Figure 1: General components of a DP logging system. 1
15:25, 26 August 2016 OI Analytical-2001-1656 appl USEPA Halogen XSDvsELCD.pdf (file) 145 KB Debra Tabron OI Analytical, 2001. Using the Halogen Specific Detector (XSDTM) as an alternative to the ELCD in USEPA Methods: Presented at the 2001 Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, New Orleans, LA 1
14:34, 19 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 1.PNG (file) 39 KB Debra Tabron Figure 1: Sampling sequence with an open-barrel, single-tube soil sampling system. The sample barrel is advanced through the open borehole to succeeding depths. 1
13:15, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 7.PNG (file) 24 KB Debra Tabron Figure 7: Components of a screened implant system for long term monitoring of VOCs in soil gas. 1
13:13, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 6.PNG (file) 24 KB Debra Tabron Figure 6: Components of a direct push soil gas sampling tool string for active soil gas sampling. 1
13:12, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 5.PNG (file) 54 KB Debra Tabron Figure 5: Structure of a prepacked screen used to build monitoring wells with DP methods. 1
13:10, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 4.PNG (file) 43 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4: A DP installed monitoring well constructed with prepacked well screens. 1
13:04, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 3.PNG (file) 49 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3: Steps in the operation of a dual-tube groundwater sampler 1
13:04, 18 August 2016 McCall Article 2. Figure 2.PNG (file) 51 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2: The outer casing of the dual-tube system remains in place to control the bore hole as the inner rod is used to trip out the sample barrel with soil core. 1
15:32, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 5.PNG (file) 24 KB Debra Tabron Figure 5: Top-down materials injection with a pressure activated probe. 1
15:30, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 4.PNG (file) 13 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4: Bottom-up tremie grouting through a tool string. 1
15:26, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 3.PNG (file) 32 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3: Schematic of the Optical Image Profiler (OIP) that uses an ultraviolet light emitting diode (UV LED) and CMOS camera to induce and capture images of petroleum fuel fluorescence through a sapphire window. 1
15:21, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 2.PNG (file) 315 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2: Monitoring water quality parameters while purging groundwater from a single-tube, protected screen, discrete interval sampler 1
15:19, 11 August 2016 McCall-Article 1-Figure 1.PNG (file) 342 KB Debra Tabron Figure 1: A track mounted DP machine set up for collection of soil and groundwater samples. The tool rack is transported to the sample location on the stabilizer bar at the back of the unit 1
15:45, 4 August 2016 USEPA-1999-Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd values-Vol 1.pdf (file) 3.61 MB Debra Tabron United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1999. Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd, values, Volume 1 – The Kd model, methods of measurement, and application of chemical reaction codes. EPA 402-R-99-004A 1
15:17, 4 August 2016 USEPA-2007-MNA of Inorganic Contaminants in GW, Vol 1 Technical Basis for Assessment.pdf (file) 2.16 MB Debra Tabron U.S.E.P.A., 2007. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganic Contaminants in Groundwater, Volume 1 Technical Basis for Assessment, Edited by R.G. Ford, R.T. Wilkin, and R.W. Puls. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/139. 1
14:38, 4 August 2016 Palmisano-2003 Bioremed. of Metals and Radionuclides What it is and How it Works.pdf (file) 2.75 MB Debra Tabron Palmisano, A. and Hazen, T., 2003. Bioremediation of metals and radionuclides: What it is and how it works. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 1
11:31, 4 August 2016 Wilkin-2007-Metal Attenuation Processes at Mining Sites.pdf (file) 475 KB Debra Tabron Wilkin, R.T., 2007. Metal Attenuation Processes at Mining Sites. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/092 1
14:55, 3 August 2016 Hem-1970-Chemical behavior of mercury in aqueous media.pdf (file) 1.57 MB Debra Tabron Hem, J.D., 1970. Chemical behavior of mercury in aqueous media. In Mercury in the Environment (Vol. 713, pp. 19-24). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. 1
11:01, 3 August 2016 Palmer-1994-Nat Att Hexavalent Chromium.pdf (file) 458 KB Debra Tabron Palmer, C.D. and Puls, R.W., 1994. Natural attenuation of hexavalent chromium in groundwater and soils. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/540/5-94/505. 1
15:04, 1 August 2016 Hazen-2008-Complexity of GW at DOE Sites.pdf (file) 686 KB Debra Tabron Hazen, T.C., Faybishenko, B., Jordan, P., 2008. Complexity of Groundwater Contaminants at DOE Sites. LBNL-4117E, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1
14:45, 1 August 2016 Riley-1992-Chemical Contaminants on DOE Lands and Selection of Contaminant Mix.pdf (file) 5.28 MB Debra Tabron Riley, R.G., Zachara, J.M., Wobber, F.J., 1992. Chemical Contaminants on DOE Lands and Selection of Contaminant Mixtures for Subsurface Science Research. DOE/ER—0547T, U.S. Department of Energy 1
14:10, 1 August 2016 GAO-2005-GW Contamination - DOD Uses and Develops a Range of Remed Technologies .pdf (file) 1.13 MB Debra Tabron Government Accountability Office, 2005. Groundwater Contamination – DOD Uses and Develops a Range of Remediation Technologies to Clean Up Military Sites. Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-05-666. 1
12:53, 1 August 2016 Fabian-2005-Army-Small-Arms-Training-Range-BMP.pdf (file) 3.17 MB Debra Tabron Fabian, G. and Watts, K., 2005. Army Small Arms Training Range Environmental Best Practices (BMPs) Manual. DTC Project No. 9-CO-160-000-504, U.S. Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. 1
11:04, 29 July 2016 Davis-1997-How Heat can Accelarate In-Situ Soil and Aqufier Remediation.pdf (file) 93 KB Debra Tabron Davis, E. L. 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Issue paper, EPA/540/S-97/502 1
12:36, 27 July 2016 Geoprobe-2003-Membrane Interface Probe SOP.pdf (file) 2.37 MB Debra Tabron Geoprobe, 2003. Geoprobe® Membrane Interface Probe (MIP) Standard Operating Procedure, Technical Bulletin No. MK3010. Revised, April, 2010. 28 Pages 1
09:54, 27 July 2016 Reiffsteck-2010-A New Hydraulic Profiling Tool including CPT Measurements.pdf (file) 280 KB Debra Tabron Reiffsteck, Ph., B. Dorbani, E. Haza-Rozier and J.-J. Fry. 2010. A New Hydraulic profiling tool including CPT measurements. Presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Volume 2: Equipment and Procedures, Paper No. 1-1... 1
09:54, 26 July 2016 Geoprobe-2011-Application of the Geoprobe HPT Logging Sys for Geo Invest..pdf (file) 1.86 MB Debra Tabron Geoprobe, 2011. Application of the Geoprobe® HPT Logging System for Geo-Environmental Investigations. Technical Bulletin No. MK3184 1
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page