Difference between revisions of "User:Debra Tabron/sandbox"

From Enviro Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) are ''in situ'' treatment zones created below ground to clean up contaminated groundwater. PRBs take advantage of natural groundwater migration to transport contaminants to a defined treatment zone. Contaminants are removed from groundwater in the PRB and treated groundwater passes through the permeable zone; eventually a “clean front” is created on the down-gradient side of the PRB.  Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) was the first reactive material used in PRBs for groundwater remediation and it continues to be the primary material used in the construction of these treatment systems. ZVI PRBs can treat groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents and their breakdown products such as tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), ''cis''-1,2-dichloroethene (''cis''-DCE), vinyl chloride (VC), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride; explosives such as TNT and RDX; cations of Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn, and Hg; and anions of Cr, As, Sb, Se, U, and Tc.
+
Nitroaromatic and nitroamine compounds in munitions constituents are susceptible to rapid degradation under alkaline (i.e., basic, high pH) environmental conditions. Alkaline degradation of the secondary explosives TNT and RDX have been examined in laboratory-scale studies and field-scale demonstrations. Both topical and deeper soil-mixed applications of alkaline substances, such as hydrated lime and caustic soda, have successfully degraded munitions constituents in highly contaminated soils on training ranges and at formerly used defense sites (FUDS).
  
 
<div style="float:right;margin:0 0 2em 2em;">__TOC__</div>
 
<div style="float:right;margin:0 0 2em 2em;">__TOC__</div>
  
 +
'''Related Article(s):'''
 +
*[[Munitions Constituents]]
 +
*[[Munitions Constituents - Composting]]
  
'''Related Article(s):'''
 
*[[Zerovalent Iron (ZVI) (Chemical Reduction - ISCR)]]
 
*[[Chemical Reduction (In Situ - ISCR)]]
 
*[[Metal and Metalloids - Remediation]]
 
*[[Chlorinated Solvents]]
 
  
'''CONTRIBUTOR(S):'''
+
'''CONTRIBUTOR(S):''' [[Jared Johnson]]
  
  
 
'''Key Resource(s)''':
 
'''Key Resource(s)''':
*[[media:2005-ITRC_Permeable_Reactive_Barriers.pdf| Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (2005)]]<ref name= "ITRC2005W">Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2005. Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions. PRB-4. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team.[[media:2005-ITRC_Permeable_Reactive_Barriers.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>.  
+
*[[media:2011_-_Johnson_-_Management_of_Munitions_Constituents_in_Soil.pdf | Management of Munitions Constituents in Soil Using Alkaline Hydrolysis: A Guide for Practitioners]]<ref name= "Johnson2011">Johnson, J.L., Felt, D.R., Martin, W.A., Britto, R., Nestler, C.C. and Larson, S.L., 2011. Management of munitions constituents in soil using alkaline hydrolysis: A guide for practitioners (No. ERDC/EL-TR-11-16). Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.[[media:2011_-_Johnson_-_Management_of_Munitions_Constituents_in_Soil.pdf | Report.pdf]]</ref>
*[[media:ITRC-2011-PRB_Tech_Update.pdf| Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update. Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (2011)]]<ref name= "ITRC2011W">Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2011. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update. PRB-5. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, PRB: Technology Update Team. [[media:ITRC-2011-PRB_Tech_Update.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>  
 
  
==Introduction==
+
==Principal of Operation==
A PRB is commonly constructed using granular iron, limestone, organic-carbon, zeolites, apatite, or mixtures of these materials with sand or gravel<ref name= "ITRC2005W"/><ref name= "ITRC2011W"/>. PRBs are installed hydraulically down-gradient from contaminant source zones to prevent off-site plume migration or to protect sensitive receptors. Design considerations for PRBs include:  
+
Alkaline hydrolysis reactions involve the aqueous interaction of added OH- ions with dissolved organic compounds. Degradation of nitroaromatics (i.e., TNT and DNT) is hypothesized to occur through formation of a Meisenheimer complex or TNT anion<ref>Saupe, A., Garvens, H.J. and Heinze, L., 1998. Alkaline hydrolysis of TNT and TNT in soil followed by thermal treatment of the hydrolysates. Chemosphere, 36(8), pp.1725-1744. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10063-7 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10063-7]</ref><ref>Salter-Blanc, A.J., Bylaska, E.J., Ritchie, J.J. and Tratnyek, P.G., 2013. Mechanisms and kinetics of alkaline hydrolysis of the energetic nitroaromatic compounds 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 2, 4-dinitroanisole (DNAN). Environmental science & technology, 47(13), pp.6790-6798. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es304461t doi:10.1021/es304461t]</ref>. Initial denitration of nitroamines (i.e., RDX, HMX, and CL-20) by OH- is thought to cause molecular instability leading to ring cleavage, followed by spontaneous decomposition <ref>Jones, W.H., 1954. Mechanism of the Homogeneous Alkaline Decomposition of Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine: Kinetics of Consecutive Second-and First-order Reactions. A Polarographic Analysis for Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine1. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 76(3), pp.829-835. [https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01632a058 doi: 10.1021/ja01632a058]</ref><ref name= "Balakrishnan2003">Balakrishnan, V.K., Halasz, A. and Hawari, J., 2003. Alkaline hydrolysis of the cyclic nitramine explosives RDX, HMX, and CL-20: New insights into degradation pathways obtained by the observation of novel intermediates. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(9), pp.1838-1843. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es020959h doi: 10.1021/es020959h]</ref>). This degradation pathway is supported by observations of nitrite and formate production during the alkaline decomposition of nitramines<ref name= "Hwang2006">Hwang, S., Felt, D.R., Bouwer, E.J., Brooks, M.C., Larson, S.L. and Davis, J.L., 2006. Remediation of RDX-contaminated water using alkaline hydrolysis. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(2), pp.256-262. [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:2(256) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:2(256)]</ref><ref name= '' Heilmann1996''>Heilmann, H.M., Wiesmann, U. and Stenstrom, M.K., 1996. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of high explosives RDX and HMX in aqueous solution and adsorbed to activated carbon. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(5), pp.1485-1492. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es9504101 doi: 10.1021/es9504101]</ref>.  
#understanding contaminant flux to determine the residence time requirement for effective treatment;
 
#understanding geochemical conditions to identify compatibility issues between the selected reactive medium and site-specific groundwater; and
 
#understanding groundwater flow to ensure the contaminant plume is intercepted for treatment (See Fig. 1) so contaminant flow beneath, around, or above the treatment system does not occur. PRBs are generally keyed into impermeable hydrostratigraphic units, such as clay layers or bedrock, to prevent underflow of contaminants beneath the treatment zone.
 
  
[[File:Wilkin1w2 Fig1.png|thumb|Figure 1. Conceptual Model of PRB. Adapted from Wilkin, et al., 2002<ref>Wilkin, R T., Puls, R W. P and Sewell, G W. Environmental Research Brief: Long-term Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers Using Zero-valent Iron: An Evaluation at Two Sites. US EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/S-02/001, 2002. [[media:2002-Wilkin-Long-term_Perf_of_Permeable_Reactive_Barriers_Using_Zero-valent.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>]]
+
The terminal degradation products of alkaline hydrolysis are commonly formate, formaldehyde, nitrate, nitrite, and nitrous oxide. At pH greater than 11, TNT degrades readily to formate and nitrate, but at lower pH it tends to polymerize<ref>Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Davis, J.L. and Larson, S.L., 2007. Potential for biodegradation of the alkaline hydrolysis end products of TNT and RDX (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-25). Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg, MS. [[media:2001-Felt-_Potential_for_biodegradatio_of_the_alkaline_hydrolysis.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>.
  
==Zerovalent Iron==
+
Propellant residues have been studied less than secondary explosives, but studies have shown the insoluble nitrocellulose matrix in some propellants to be rendered biodegradable under alkaline conditions<ref>Kenyon, W.O. and Gray, H.L., 1936. The Alkaline Decomposition of Cellulose Nitrate. I. Quantitative Studies1. Journal of The American Chemical Society, 58(8), pp.1422-1427. [https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01299a034 doi: 10.1021/ja01299a034]</ref><ref>Kim, B.J., Alleman, J.E. and Quivey, D.M., 1998. Alkaline hydrolysis/biodegradation of nitrocellulose fines (No. CERL-TR-98/65). Consstruction Engineering Researcg Lab (ARMY) Champaign, IL.[[media:1998-Kim-Alkline_Hydrolysis_Biodegradation_of_Nitrocellulose_Fines.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>. Ultimately, alkaline material is neutralized over time by the natural buffering capacity of soil.
The first field-scale test of a PRB constructed with ZVI was conducted in 1991 at the Canadian Forces Base, Borden, Ontario by researchers from the University of Waterloo<ref>Gillham, R.W. and O'Hannesin, S.F., 1994. Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero‐valent iron. Groundwater, 32(6), pp.958-967. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00935.x doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00935.x]</ref><ref>O'Hannesin, S.F. and Gillham, R.W., 1998. Long‐term performance of an in situ “iron wall” for remediation of VOCs. Groundwater, 36(1), pp.164-170. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01077.x doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01077.x]</ref>.  The first full-scale ZVI-based PRB was constructed in Sunnyvale, California in 1994 to treat groundwater contaminated with TCE and ''cis''-DCE<ref name= "Warner2005">Warner, S.D., Longino, B.L., Zhang, M.I.A.O., Bennett, P., Szerdy, F.S. and Hamilton, L.A., 2005. The first commercial permeable reactive barrier composed of granular iron: hydraulic and chemical performance at 10 years of operation. IAHS Publication, 298, p.32 - 42. ISBN 1-901502-23-6]</ref>.  Long-term performance studies have documented sustained removal of trichloroethene and hexavalent chromium by ZVI PRBs and their continued hydraulic performance for up to 15 years<ref name= "Warner2005"/><ref>Phillips, D.H., Nooten, T.V., Bastiaens, L., Russell, M.I., Dickson, K., Plant, S., Ahad, J.M.E., Newton, T., Elliot, T. and Kalin, R.M., 2010. Ten year performance evaluation of a field-scale zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier installed to remediate trichloroethene contaminated groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(10), pp.3861-3869. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es902737t doi: 10.1021/es902737t]</ref><ref>Wilkin, R.T., Acree, S.D., Ross, R.R., Puls, R.W., Lee, T.R. and Woods, L.L., 2014. Fifteen-year assessment of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of chromate and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 468, pp.186-194. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.056 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.056]</ref>.
 
  
ZVI degrades chlorinated ethenes, ethanes, and methanes via reductive abiotic reactions that largely circumvent the production of toxic chlorinated daughter compounds, such as vinyl chloride, which can be produced during biological reduction<ref>Matheson, L.J. and Tratnyek, P.G., 1994. Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated methanes by iron metal. Environmental Science & Technology, 28(12), pp.2045-2053. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00061a012 doi:10.1021/es00061a012]</ref><ref name= "Arnold2000">Arnold, W.A. and Roberts, A.L., 2000. Pathways and kinetics of chlorinated ethylene and chlorinated acetylene reaction with Fe (0) particles. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(9), pp.1794-1805. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es990884q doi: 10.1021/es990884q]</ref>. For example, Arnold and Roberts<ref name= "Arnold2000"/> reported that >85% of PCE and >90% of TCE treatment by zerovalent iron is accounted for by &beta;-elimination reactions that avoid production of ''cis''-DCE and VC.  
+
==Aqueous Kinetics==
 +
Degradation rates by alkaline hydrolysis for major secondary explosive compounds in aqueous systems have been measured under a range of pHs and temperatures (Table 1). Reported half-lives of TNT ranged from about 2-6 hours at pH 12 to up to six days at pH 11 in stirred aqueous reactors<ref name= ''Emmrich1999''>Emmrich, M., 1999. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene in aqueous solution and highly contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(21), pp.3802-3805. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es9903227  doi: 10.1021/es9903227]</ref><ref name= "Hwang2005">Hwang, S., Ruff, T.J., Bouwer, E.J., Larson, S.L. and Davis, J.L., 2005. Applicability of alkaline hydrolysis for remediation of TNT-contaminated water. Water research, 39(18), pp.4503-4511. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.008]</ref>. Hydrolysis of RDX is reported to also occur with half-lives on the order of hours, with a strong dependence on<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/><ref name= "Hwang2006"/>. HMX reacted more slowly with a reaction rate two orders of magnitude slower than that observed for RDX<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>. Alkaline hydrolysis of the caged nitroamine CL-20 had an observed half-life of roughly one hour in pH 10 solution and on the order of minutes at higher pH<ref name= "Balakrishnan2003"/>.  
  
Zerovalent Iron has also been used in pilot or full-scale tests to treat groundwater contaminated with metals (e.g., chromium), metalloids (e.g., arsenic), and radionuclides (e.g., uranium)<ref>Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J., Benner, S.G., McRae, C.W., Bennett, T.A. and Puls, R.W., 2000. Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(1), pp.123-137</ref><ref>Puls, R.W., Paul, C.J. and Powell, R.M., 1999. The application of in situ permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of chromate-contaminated groundwater: a field test. Applied Geochemistry, 14(8), pp.989-1000. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00010-4 doi: 10.1016/s0883-2927(99)00010-4]</ref><ref>Wilkin, R.T., Acree, S.D., Ross, R.R., Beak, D.G. and Lee, T.R., 2009. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 106(1-2), pp.1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.12.002]</ref><ref>Morrison, S.J., Metzler, D.R. and Carpenter, C.E., 2001. Uranium precipitation in a permeable reactive barrier by progressive irreversible dissolution of zerovalent iron. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(2), pp.385-390. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es001204i  doi: 10.1021/es001204i]</ref>. Contaminant removal processes are complex and involve a combination of sorption to the surface of the ZVI or secondary minerals formed in the PRB, reductive precipitation, and co-precipitation. Other possible uses of ZVI for groundwater include treatment of explosives such as nitro aromatic compounds<ref>Agrawal, A. and Tratnyek, P.G., 1995. Reduction of nitro aromatic compounds by zero-valent iron metal. Environmental Science & Technology,30(1), pp.153-160. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es950211h doi:10.1021/es950211h]</ref><ref>Scherer, M.M., Johnson, K.M., Westall, J.C. and Tratnyek, P.G., 2001. Mass transport effects on the kinetics of nitrobenzene reduction by iron metal. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(13), pp.2804-2811. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es0016856 doi: 10.1021/es0016856]</ref>. Treatment applications of ZVI for organic and inorganic contaminants encountered in groundwater at hazardous waste sites are summarized in Table 1.
+
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
 
+
|+ <div style="text-align: left;"> Table 1. Observed batch kinetics for the alkaline destruction of secondary explosive compounds in aqueous systems.</div>
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left;"
+
|-
{| class="wikitable" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;
+
! Compound
|+ <div style="text-align: center;"> Table 1. Groundwater Contaminants Treated by Granular ZVI</div>
+
! pH
 +
! Temp<br />(&deg;C)
 +
! Pseudo 1<sup>st</sup> Order<br />Decay Constant<br />(min<sup>-1</sup>)(10<sup>-3</sup>)
 +
! Observed<br />Half-Life<br />(min)
 +
! Reference
 +
|-
 +
! rowspan="6" | TNT
 +
| 10 || 20 ||0.0 || n/a || Emmrich, 1999<ref name= ''Emmrich1999''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11 || 20 || 0.43 || 1,600 || Emmrich, 1999<ref name= ''Emmrich1999''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 20 || 6.1 || 115 || Emmrich, 1999<ref name= ''Emmrich1999''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11 || 25 || 0.15 || 4,621 || Hwang, et al., 2005<ref name= "Hwang2005"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11.5 || 25 || 0.34 || 2,039 || Hwang, et al., 2005<ref name= "Hwang2005"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11.9 || 25 || 1.1 || 630 || Hwang, et al., 2005<ref name= "Hwang2005"/>
 +
|-
 +
! rowspan="14" | RDX
 +
| 11.18 || 50 || 9.3 || 75 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11.32 || 50 || 13 || 53 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 50 || 58.2 || 12 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12.3 || 50 || 127.2 || 5.5 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11 || 25 || 0.8 || 866 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 11.5 || 25 || 1.7 || 408 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 25 || 2.3 || 301 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12.2 || 25 || 7.9 || 88 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12.6 || 25 || 22.3 || 31 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 13 || 25 || 27.7 || 25 || Hwang, et al., 2006<ref name= "Hwang2006"/>
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 25 || 2.7 || 260 || Gent, et al., 2010<ref name= '' Gent2010''>Gent, D.B., Johnson, J.L., Felt, D.R., O'Connor, G., Holland, E., May, S. and Larson, S.L., 2010. Laboratory demonstration of abiotic technologies for removal of RDX from a process waste stream (No. ERDC/EL-TR-10-8). Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg MS Environmental Lab. [[media:2010-Gent-laboratory_Demostration_of_abiotic_tech_for_removal_of_RDX.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>
 +
|-
 +
| 12.5 || 25 || 8.3 || 83 || Gent, et al., 2010<ref name= '' Gent2010''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 13 || 25 || 26.8 || 26 || Gent, et al., 2010<ref name= '' Gent2010''/>
 +
|-
 +
| 13.3 || 25 || 52.3 || 13 || Gent, et al., 2010<ref name= '' Gent2010''/>
 
|-
 
|-
! Contaminant Class
+
! rowspan="3" | HMX
! Contaminant
+
| 10.34 || 50 || 0.09 || 7,788 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
! Removal Mechanism
 
 
|-
 
|-
| Chlorinated Ethenes || Tetrachloroethene, PCE <br />Trichloroethene, TCE <br />''cis''-1,2-Dichloroethene, ''cis''-DCE <br />''trans''-1,2-Dichloroethene, ''trans''-DCE <br />1,1- Dichloroethene, 1,1-DCE <br />Vinyl Chloride, VC || &alpha;-elimination <br />&beta;-elimination <br />Hydrogenolysis
+
| 11.32 || 50 || 0.99 || 700 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 
|-
 
|-
| Chlorinated Ethanes || Hexachloroethane, HCA <br />1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-TeCA <br />1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-TeCA <br />1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-TCA <br />1,1-Dichloroethane, 1,1-DCA || &alpha;-elimination <br />&beta;-elimination <br />Hydrogenolysis
+
| 12.36 || 50 || 1.1 || 641 || Heilmann, et al., 1996<ref name= '' Heilmann1996''/>
 
|-
 
|-
| Chlorinated Methanes || Tetrachloromethane, CT <br />Trichloromethane, TCM || &alpha;-elimination <br />&beta;-elimination <br />Hydrogenolysis
+
! rowspan="4" | CL-20
 +
| 10 || 25 || 8 || 87 || Santiago, et al., 2007<ref name= "Santigo2007">Santiago, L., Felt, D.R. and Davis, J.L., 2007. Chemical Remediation of an Ordnance-Related Compound: The Alkaline Hydrolysis of CL-20. Environmental Quality Technology Program (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-18). Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS Environmental Lab. [[media:2007-Santiago-chemical_remediation_of_an_ordnance_related_compound.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
| Explosives || Trinitrotoluene (TNT) <br />Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) || Adsorption <br /> Reduction to 2,4,6-triaminotoluene (TAT)
+
| 11 || 25 || 50.3 || 14 || Santiago, et al., 2007<ref name= "Santigo2007"/>
 
|-
 
|-
| Anionic Metals || Chromium <br />Arsenic <br />Antimony <br />Selenium <br />Uranium <br />Technetium || Reductive precipitation <br />Co-precipitation <br />Adsorption
+
| 11.5 || 25 || 147.7 || 4.7 || Santiago, et al., 2007<ref name= "Santigo2007"/>
 
|-
 
|-
| Metals || Lead <br />Cadmium <br />Nickel <br />Zinc <br />Mercury || Precipitation <br />Co-precipitation <br />Adsorption
+
| 12 || 25 || 858 || 0.8 || Santiago, et al., 2007<ref name= "Santigo2007"/>
 
|}
 
|}
  
==PRB Design and Site Conditions==
+
==Performance in Soil Systems==
Like other ''in-situ'' technologies used for groundwater cleanup, PRB designs rely on accurate site characterization data for geology, hydrology, and groundwater geochemistry. Site hydrologic aspects critical for PRB design and performance include seasonal consistency in groundwater flow direction to maintain migration of contaminants to the PRB at an appropriate flow velocity. High flow velocities (≳2 m/d) can result in short residence time in the treatment zone and early breakthrough of contaminants; low flow velocities (≲0.1 m/d) result in little change in contaminant concentrations over time, so wells in down-gradient regions respond slowly.
+
[[File:Johnson1w2 Fig1.png|thumb|right|Figure 1: RDX concentrations in leachate by rain event for meso-scale lysimeters containing hand grenade range soils as reported by Larson et al. (2007)<ref name= "Larson2007"/>]]
Geochemical considerations for the design of ZVI PRBs include redox conditions and the concentrations and make up of major ions dissolved in local groundwater. Geochemical conditions that are favorable for the sustained performance of ZVI PRBs include:
 
  
<u>Dissolved O<sub>2</sub> concentrations ≲2 mg/L</u>: Excess dissolved oxygen leads to rapid iron corrosion and formation of low density iron oxide precipitates that may lead to hydraulic failure.  
+
Alkaline material is neutralized over time by the natural buffering capacity of the soil. Protons (H<sup>+</sup>) exchanged from low pH soils and metal cations interact with hydroxide (OH-) ions to mitigate the alkaline degradation of munitions constituents. Furthermore, hydrogen ions associated with various functional groups in humic matter may also dissociate under elevated pH conditions and likewise inhibit alkaline hydrolysis of the explosive contaminants. Soil chemistry therefore plays an important role in energetics remediation through alkaline hydrolysis.
  
<u>Nitrate-N concentrations ≲10 mg/L</u>: Like dissolved oxygen, nitrate enhanced iron corrosion leads to rapid iron corrosion and formation of low density iron oxide precipitates that may lead to hydraulic failure<ref>Liang, L., Moline, G.R., Kamolpornwijit, W. and West, O.R., 2005. Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on zero-valent iron reactive barrier performance: A field investigation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 78(4), pp.291-312. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.006]</ref>.
+
Soil microcosm studies with 5% w/w calcium hydroxide and 50% w/w water observed half-lives for TNT, RDX, and HMX on the order of a day to a week, with degradation rates following the sequence of TNT > RDX > HMX, similar to the aqueous studies. Soil slurries using 2,4-DNT and the single amino substituted TNT degradation products (4A-2,6-DNT and 2A-4,6-DNT) also exhibited day to week-long half-lives at pH 11 and 12<ref name= ''Emmrich1999''/><ref>Emmrich, M., 2001. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of important nitroaromatic co-contaminants of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene in highly contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(5), pp.874-877. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es0014990 doi: 10.1021/es0014990 doi: 10.1021/es0014990 ]</ref>.
  
<u>Bicarbonate alkalinity ≲250 mg CaCO<sub>3</sub>/L</u>: Carbonate minerals (aragonite, siderite, chukanovite, carbonate-green rust) precipitate in the moderately alkaline pH environment (pH<sup>~</sup>10) produced by ZVI PRBs and most of the porosity and reactivity reduction in PRBs can be accounted for by these minerals (see Figure 2)<ref>Jeen, S.W., Gillham, R.W. and Blowes, D.W., 2006. Effects of carbonate precipitates on long-term performance of granular iron for reductive dechlorination of TCE. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(20), pp.6432-6437. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es0608747 doi: 10.1021/es0608747]</ref><ref>Li, L., Benson, C.H. and Lawson, E.M., 2006. Modeling porosity reductions caused by mineral fouling in continuous-wall permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 83(1-2), pp.89-121. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.11.004]</ref><ref>Parbs, A., Ebert, M. and Dahmke, A., 2007. Long-term effects of dissolved carbonate species on the degradation of trichloroethylene by zerovalent iron. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(1), pp.291-296. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es061397v  doi: 10.1021/es061397v]</ref><ref>Henderson, A.D. and Demond, A.H., 2007. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review. Environmental Engineering Science, 24(4), pp.401-423. [https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.0071 doi: 10.1089/ees.2006.0071]</ref>.  
+
A meso-scale soil treatability study was conducted using soils collected from two different hand grenade ranges<ref name= "Larson2007">Larson, S.L., Davis, J.L., Martin, W.A., Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Brandon, D.L., Fabian, G. and O'Connor, G., 2007. Grenade Range Management Using Lime for Metals Immobilization and Explosives Transformation Treatability Study (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-5). Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. [[media:2007-Larson-grenade_Range_Management_Using_Lime_for_Metals_Immobilization.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref>. These soils were treated with a well-mixed application of hydrated lime, and migration of RDX was monitored by analyzing porewater concentrations in installed lysimeters over time (Figure 1). Overall, the reduction in RDX leaving the mesocosms as both leachate and runoff was greater than 90% with application of hydrated lime. The study authors also observed that alkaline amendments were able to fix metals contamination in place on hand grenade range soils.
  
<u>Sulfate concentrations ≳100 mg/L</u>: High dissolved hydrogen generated by iron corrosion creates a favorable environment for sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane-producing archaea. Metal sulfide precipitates like mackinawite (FeS) provide a source of secondary reactivity for chlorinated solvents and metals<ref>Butler, E.C. and Hayes, K.F., 1999. Kinetics of the transformation of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene by iron sulfide. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(12), pp.2021-2027. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9809455 doi: 10.1021/es9809455]</ref><ref>Beak, D.G. and Wilkin, R.T., 2009. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 106(1-2), pp.15-28. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.12.003]</ref>. Thus, levels of sulfate in influent groundwater promote natural sulfidation of ZVI PRBs and potentially enhanced treatment capacity<ref>Fan, D., Lan, Y., Tratnyek, P.G., Johnson, R.L., Filip, J., O’Carroll, D.M., Nunez Garcia, A. and Agrawal, A., 2017. Sulfidation of iron-based materials: A review of processes and implications for water treatment and remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22), pp.13070-13085. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04177  doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04177]</ref>.
+
==Field-Scale Performance Examples==
 +
===Hand Grenade Range===
 +
[[File:Johnson1w2 Fig2.png|thumb|Figure 2: Mean pore water RDX concentrations by hand grenade bay and lysimeter with maximum and  minimum concentration profiles (avg, n ranges from 7 to 10; modified from Larson et al., 2007)<ref name= "Larson2007"/>.]]
 +
Alkaline hydrolysis was successfully employed at a hand grenade range that experiences ~55,000 hand grenade detonations each year<ref name= "Larson2007"/><ref>Martin, W.A., Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Fabian, G., O’Connor, G. and Larson, S.L., 2012. Hydrated Lime for Metal Immobilization and Explosives Transformation: Field Demonstration. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 17(3), pp.237-244. [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000176 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000176]</ref>. During this demonstration, initial soil samples were collected from individual grenade bays and lysimeters were installed to a depth of 5 feet below ground surface. Lime was applied in December, 2005, April, 2006, and January, 2007, with nine discrete sampling events occurring between December, 2005, and March, 2007. Lysimeter concentrations are shown in Figure 2 for one treated grenade bay and another untreated control bay. Based on the average pore water concentration in the treated and untreated bays over the demonstration period, there was a 77% reduction in RDX concentration in pore water from the treated bay. There is a statistically significant difference between the explosives concentration in the pore water from the untreated vs. the limed bays (P < 0.001).
  
<u>Total dissolved solids below ≲1500 mg/L</u>:  The amount of secondary mineralization and clogging potential increases with increasing solute levels.
+
A project has been funded beginning in FY19 to re-examine liming practices at this hand grenade range and produce a report on the long term efficacy of this management technique for an active training range.
  
[[File:Wilkin1w2 Fig2.png|thumb|Figure 2. False-color scanning electron micrograph<ref>ESTCP, 2018. Analysis of Long-Term Performance of Zero-valent Iron Applications. Project Report #ER-201589-PR. [[media:2018-ESTCP_Analysis_of_Long-Term_performance_of_Zero-valent_Iron_App.pdf| Report.pdf]]</ref> of a zero-valent iron grain (pink) coated with secondary precipitates (iron oxide and aragonite; green) surrounded by native aquifer quartz grains (blue). The iron particle is approximately 1.5 mm in length. ]]
+
===Ammunition Plant===
 +
''Ex-situ'' alkaline hydrolysis was used at an ammunition plant to remediate surface soil (0 to 20 feet below ground surface) that had high concentrations of DNT and TNT<ref name= "Johnson2011"/>Laboratory experiments on this soil demonstrated that target nitroaromatic compounds could be reduced to less than 10 mg/kg within a week. The only final product of note was nitrite, which could be destroyed via a denitrification process if necessary. Over a two-year period, approximately 150,000 tons of impacted soils were treated and approximately 148,000 lbs of nitroaromatic compounds destroyed, with an average contaminant mass reduction of 96 percent. Subsequent ''in-situ'' treatment was used to remediate over 15,000 additional tons of soil.
  
==Performance Monitoring==
+
The basic ''ex-situ'' treatment process involved the excavation of contaminated soil to a lined basin onsite. A typical excavation is shown in Figure 3. Caustic reagents in pellet form were added at a one to two percent weight by weight basis (depending on the starting concentrations, starting pH, and the buffering capacity) along with small quantities of metal catalyst, if needed. The soil was treated in 300 cubic yard batches, with amended chemicals thoroughly mixed into the soil using conventional equipment.  Water was added as needed to increase the moisture content to near saturation. Mixing was repeated two to three times a week and samples were collected for moisture content and pH, which are critical field monitoring and effectiveness parameters.
Performance monitoring of PRBs typically includes: 1) sampling groundwater monitoring wells located up-gradient of the PRB to establish influent contaminant concentrations and groundwater geochemistry; 2) sampling groundwater monitoring wells located within the PRB to establish in-wall behavior; and, 3) sampling groundwater monitoring wells located down-gradient of the PRB to establish contaminant concentrations and groundwater geochemistry in the effluent. Key monitoring parameters include: contaminant(s) and daughter product(s), pH, oxidation-reduction potential, specific conductance, alkalinity, calcium, iron, and sulfate. These monitoring parameters provide an indication of whether or not the expected geochemical environment is present within the treatment zone, and also that contaminant degradation is occurring.
 
  
For chlorinated solvents, analysis of the parent compounds and daughter products (e.g., ethene and ethane) aids in the performance analysis. Compound-specific isotope analysis can be helpful to understand contaminant degradation processes in complicated systems<ref>VanStone, N., Przepiora, A., Vogan, J., Lacrampe-Couloume, G., Powers, B., Perez, E., Mabury, S. and Lollar, B.S., 2005. Monitoring trichloroethene remediation at an iron permeable reactive barrier using stable carbon isotopic analysis. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 78(4), pp.313-325. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.013]</ref><ref>Lojkasek‐Lima, P., Aravena, R., Shouakar‐Stash, O., Frape, S.K., Marchesi, M., Fiorenza, S. and Vogan, J., 2012. Evaluating TCE abiotic and biotic degradation pathways in a permeable reactive barrier using compound specific isotope analysis. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 32(4), pp.53-62. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2012.01403.x doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2012.01403.x]</ref>.
+
After one week, soil sampling was performed per site specific sampling protocol and analyzed for contaminants of concern, daughter products, and breakdown products. If needed for soil with higher concentrations of explosives, caustic reagent was supplemented to maintain the pH at the 13.0 unit level. Soil continued to be treated until TNT and DNT concentrations were below cleanup levels (57 mg/kg for TNT and 25.4 mg/kg for total DNTs). Metals were also analyzed periodically and TCLP tests were performed per site treatment goals. When needed on a small percentage of batches, denitrification of soil was performed to lower the nitrite end-product using citric acid as the pH reducer and carbon substrate. After complete treatment, the soil was transported back to the excavation. ''In-situ'' treatment is performed in a similar way to ''ex-situ'' treatment using conventional equipment and prescribed quantities of chemical reagents.
Hydrologic monitoring typically consists of gradient analysis to determine flow directions and whether water level changes are abrupt in the vicinity of the PRB, indicating the potential for impeded groundwater flow. Core collection with solid-phase analysis and/or geophysical surveys (e.g., conductivity probing) are not common or routine components of performance monitoring, but can be considered in situations where anomalous behavior is encountered such as a failure to meet performance criteria.
 
  
Problems noted with the application of this, and other, ''in situ''technologies include:  
+
[[File:Johnson1w2 Fig3.png|thumb|right|Figure 3: Soil mixing during ex situ alkaline treatment of soils  at an ammunition plant.]]
*contaminants are present down-gradient of the PRB prior to installation;
 
*influent contaminant concentrations may increase with time such that necessary residence time requirements are not met;
 
*incomplete capture of the plume, especially along peripheries of the plume;
 
*unaccounted for high contaminant flux zones and early breakthrough; and,
 
*incomplete coverage of the reactive medium in the subsurface.  
 
Many of these issues can be addressed with rigorous site characterization, which may incur extra cost and time prior to remediation, but can potentially avoid implementation of secondary measures.
 
  
==Summary & Outlook==
+
Some general heuristic guidelines are summarized in Figure 4. An active firing range requires treatment technologies that have minimal soil disturbance, requiring topical application of hydrated lime for most range applications. Therefore the fate of hydroxide (OH-) ions during transport through the soil is an important aspect of this proposed remediation technology. Studies performed by the agricultural and oil industries provide evidence of the transport limitations of hydroxide ions in soils, particularly in those soils with significant clay content <ref>Breit, V.S., Mayer, E.H. and Carmichael, J.D., 1979, January. An easily applied black oil model of caustic waterflooding. In SPE California Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers. [https://doi.org/10.2118/7999-MS doi: 10.2118/7999-MS]</ref><ref>DeZabala, E.F., Vislocky, J.M., Rubin, E. and Radke, C.J., 1982. A chemical theory for linear alkaline flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 22(02), pp.245-258. [https://doi.org/10.2118/8997-PA [https://doi.org/10.2118/8997-PA doi: 10.2118/8997-PA]</ref><ref>Somerton, W. H., and C. J. Radke. 1980. Roles of clays in the enhanced recovery of petroleum. Proceedings of the first joint SPE/DOE symposium on enhance oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers</ref><ref>Smith, C.J., Peoples, M.B., Keerthisinghe, G., James, T.R., Garden, D.L. and Tuomi, S.S., 1994. Effect of surface applications of lime, gypsum and phosphogypsum on the alleviating of surface and subsurface acidity in a soil under pasture. Soil Research, 32(5), pp.995-1008. [https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9940995 doi: 10.1071/SR9940995]</ref>.
ZVI is perhaps the most widely studied and best understood reactive material used for groundwater remediation. It will continue to serve as a benchmark for other novel treatment media and for studying treatment options for emerging contaminants. The environmental industry is becoming accustomed to screening sites for potential ZVI applications and is actively taking advantage of improving ZVI performance, i.e., through natural sulfidation and treating up-gradient sources of contamination to extend the lifetime of the PRB. Advantages of using ZVI in PRBs for remediating contaminated groundwater include: wide range of treatable contaminants (organics and inorganics); expectation of complete subsurface coverage; and, flexible adaptation to variable contaminant flux and plume geometry. Disadvantages include: construction challenges and uncertainty in predicting long-term treatment and hydraulic performance. These uncertainties can often be addressed with rigorous site characterization.
 
  
 +
[[File:Johnson1w2 Fig4.png|thumb|center|600 px|Figure 4: General heuristics for determining application of alkaline amendments for the management of munitions constituents in soil.]]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 15:17, 31 January 2019

Nitroaromatic and nitroamine compounds in munitions constituents are susceptible to rapid degradation under alkaline (i.e., basic, high pH) environmental conditions. Alkaline degradation of the secondary explosives TNT and RDX have been examined in laboratory-scale studies and field-scale demonstrations. Both topical and deeper soil-mixed applications of alkaline substances, such as hydrated lime and caustic soda, have successfully degraded munitions constituents in highly contaminated soils on training ranges and at formerly used defense sites (FUDS).

Related Article(s):


CONTRIBUTOR(S): Jared Johnson


Key Resource(s):

Principal of Operation

Alkaline hydrolysis reactions involve the aqueous interaction of added OH- ions with dissolved organic compounds. Degradation of nitroaromatics (i.e., TNT and DNT) is hypothesized to occur through formation of a Meisenheimer complex or TNT anion[2][3]. Initial denitration of nitroamines (i.e., RDX, HMX, and CL-20) by OH- is thought to cause molecular instability leading to ring cleavage, followed by spontaneous decomposition [4][5]). This degradation pathway is supported by observations of nitrite and formate production during the alkaline decomposition of nitramines[6][7].

The terminal degradation products of alkaline hydrolysis are commonly formate, formaldehyde, nitrate, nitrite, and nitrous oxide. At pH greater than 11, TNT degrades readily to formate and nitrate, but at lower pH it tends to polymerize[8].

Propellant residues have been studied less than secondary explosives, but studies have shown the insoluble nitrocellulose matrix in some propellants to be rendered biodegradable under alkaline conditions[9][10]. Ultimately, alkaline material is neutralized over time by the natural buffering capacity of soil.

Aqueous Kinetics

Degradation rates by alkaline hydrolysis for major secondary explosive compounds in aqueous systems have been measured under a range of pHs and temperatures (Table 1). Reported half-lives of TNT ranged from about 2-6 hours at pH 12 to up to six days at pH 11 in stirred aqueous reactors[11][12]. Hydrolysis of RDX is reported to also occur with half-lives on the order of hours, with a strong dependence on[7][6]. HMX reacted more slowly with a reaction rate two orders of magnitude slower than that observed for RDX[7]. Alkaline hydrolysis of the caged nitroamine CL-20 had an observed half-life of roughly one hour in pH 10 solution and on the order of minutes at higher pH[5].

Table 1. Observed batch kinetics for the alkaline destruction of secondary explosive compounds in aqueous systems.

Compound pH Temp
(°C)
Pseudo 1st Order
Decay Constant
(min-1)(10-3)
Observed
Half-Life
(min)
Reference
TNT 10 20 0.0 n/a Emmrich, 1999[11]
11 20 0.43 1,600 Emmrich, 1999[11]
12 20 6.1 115 Emmrich, 1999[11]
11 25 0.15 4,621 Hwang, et al., 2005[12]
11.5 25 0.34 2,039 Hwang, et al., 2005[12]
11.9 25 1.1 630 Hwang, et al., 2005[12]
RDX 11.18 50 9.3 75 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
11.32 50 13 53 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
12 50 58.2 12 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
12.3 50 127.2 5.5 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
11 25 0.8 866 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
11.5 25 1.7 408 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
12 25 2.3 301 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
12.2 25 7.9 88 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
12.6 25 22.3 31 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
13 25 27.7 25 Hwang, et al., 2006[6]
12 25 2.7 260 Gent, et al., 2010[7]
12.5 25 8.3 83 Gent, et al., 2010[7]
13 25 26.8 26 Gent, et al., 2010[7]
13.3 25 52.3 13 Gent, et al., 2010[7]
HMX 10.34 50 0.09 7,788 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
11.32 50 0.99 700 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
12.36 50 1.1 641 Heilmann, et al., 1996[7]
CL-20 10 25 8 87 Santiago, et al., 2007[13]
11 25 50.3 14 Santiago, et al., 2007[13]
11.5 25 147.7 4.7 Santiago, et al., 2007[13]
12 25 858 0.8 Santiago, et al., 2007[13]

Performance in Soil Systems

Figure 1: RDX concentrations in leachate by rain event for meso-scale lysimeters containing hand grenade range soils as reported by Larson et al. (2007)[14]

Alkaline material is neutralized over time by the natural buffering capacity of the soil. Protons (H+) exchanged from low pH soils and metal cations interact with hydroxide (OH-) ions to mitigate the alkaline degradation of munitions constituents. Furthermore, hydrogen ions associated with various functional groups in humic matter may also dissociate under elevated pH conditions and likewise inhibit alkaline hydrolysis of the explosive contaminants. Soil chemistry therefore plays an important role in energetics remediation through alkaline hydrolysis.

Soil microcosm studies with 5% w/w calcium hydroxide and 50% w/w water observed half-lives for TNT, RDX, and HMX on the order of a day to a week, with degradation rates following the sequence of TNT > RDX > HMX, similar to the aqueous studies. Soil slurries using 2,4-DNT and the single amino substituted TNT degradation products (4A-2,6-DNT and 2A-4,6-DNT) also exhibited day to week-long half-lives at pH 11 and 12[11][15].

A meso-scale soil treatability study was conducted using soils collected from two different hand grenade ranges[14]. These soils were treated with a well-mixed application of hydrated lime, and migration of RDX was monitored by analyzing porewater concentrations in installed lysimeters over time (Figure 1). Overall, the reduction in RDX leaving the mesocosms as both leachate and runoff was greater than 90% with application of hydrated lime. The study authors also observed that alkaline amendments were able to fix metals contamination in place on hand grenade range soils.

Field-Scale Performance Examples

Hand Grenade Range

Figure 2: Mean pore water RDX concentrations by hand grenade bay and lysimeter with maximum and minimum concentration profiles (avg, n ranges from 7 to 10; modified from Larson et al., 2007)[14].

Alkaline hydrolysis was successfully employed at a hand grenade range that experiences ~55,000 hand grenade detonations each year[14][16]. During this demonstration, initial soil samples were collected from individual grenade bays and lysimeters were installed to a depth of 5 feet below ground surface. Lime was applied in December, 2005, April, 2006, and January, 2007, with nine discrete sampling events occurring between December, 2005, and March, 2007. Lysimeter concentrations are shown in Figure 2 for one treated grenade bay and another untreated control bay. Based on the average pore water concentration in the treated and untreated bays over the demonstration period, there was a 77% reduction in RDX concentration in pore water from the treated bay. There is a statistically significant difference between the explosives concentration in the pore water from the untreated vs. the limed bays (P < 0.001).

A project has been funded beginning in FY19 to re-examine liming practices at this hand grenade range and produce a report on the long term efficacy of this management technique for an active training range.

Ammunition Plant

Ex-situ alkaline hydrolysis was used at an ammunition plant to remediate surface soil (0 to 20 feet below ground surface) that had high concentrations of DNT and TNT[1]Laboratory experiments on this soil demonstrated that target nitroaromatic compounds could be reduced to less than 10 mg/kg within a week. The only final product of note was nitrite, which could be destroyed via a denitrification process if necessary. Over a two-year period, approximately 150,000 tons of impacted soils were treated and approximately 148,000 lbs of nitroaromatic compounds destroyed, with an average contaminant mass reduction of 96 percent. Subsequent in-situ treatment was used to remediate over 15,000 additional tons of soil.

The basic ex-situ treatment process involved the excavation of contaminated soil to a lined basin onsite. A typical excavation is shown in Figure 3. Caustic reagents in pellet form were added at a one to two percent weight by weight basis (depending on the starting concentrations, starting pH, and the buffering capacity) along with small quantities of metal catalyst, if needed. The soil was treated in 300 cubic yard batches, with amended chemicals thoroughly mixed into the soil using conventional equipment. Water was added as needed to increase the moisture content to near saturation. Mixing was repeated two to three times a week and samples were collected for moisture content and pH, which are critical field monitoring and effectiveness parameters.

After one week, soil sampling was performed per site specific sampling protocol and analyzed for contaminants of concern, daughter products, and breakdown products. If needed for soil with higher concentrations of explosives, caustic reagent was supplemented to maintain the pH at the 13.0 unit level. Soil continued to be treated until TNT and DNT concentrations were below cleanup levels (57 mg/kg for TNT and 25.4 mg/kg for total DNTs). Metals were also analyzed periodically and TCLP tests were performed per site treatment goals. When needed on a small percentage of batches, denitrification of soil was performed to lower the nitrite end-product using citric acid as the pH reducer and carbon substrate. After complete treatment, the soil was transported back to the excavation. In-situ treatment is performed in a similar way to ex-situ treatment using conventional equipment and prescribed quantities of chemical reagents.

Figure 3: Soil mixing during ex situ alkaline treatment of soils at an ammunition plant.

Some general heuristic guidelines are summarized in Figure 4. An active firing range requires treatment technologies that have minimal soil disturbance, requiring topical application of hydrated lime for most range applications. Therefore the fate of hydroxide (OH-) ions during transport through the soil is an important aspect of this proposed remediation technology. Studies performed by the agricultural and oil industries provide evidence of the transport limitations of hydroxide ions in soils, particularly in those soils with significant clay content [17][18][19][20].

Figure 4: General heuristics for determining application of alkaline amendments for the management of munitions constituents in soil.

References

  1. ^ 1.0 1.1 Johnson, J.L., Felt, D.R., Martin, W.A., Britto, R., Nestler, C.C. and Larson, S.L., 2011. Management of munitions constituents in soil using alkaline hydrolysis: A guide for practitioners (No. ERDC/EL-TR-11-16). Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Report.pdf
  2. ^ Saupe, A., Garvens, H.J. and Heinze, L., 1998. Alkaline hydrolysis of TNT and TNT in soil followed by thermal treatment of the hydrolysates. Chemosphere, 36(8), pp.1725-1744. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10063-7
  3. ^ Salter-Blanc, A.J., Bylaska, E.J., Ritchie, J.J. and Tratnyek, P.G., 2013. Mechanisms and kinetics of alkaline hydrolysis of the energetic nitroaromatic compounds 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 2, 4-dinitroanisole (DNAN). Environmental science & technology, 47(13), pp.6790-6798. doi:10.1021/es304461t
  4. ^ Jones, W.H., 1954. Mechanism of the Homogeneous Alkaline Decomposition of Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine: Kinetics of Consecutive Second-and First-order Reactions. A Polarographic Analysis for Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine1. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 76(3), pp.829-835. doi: 10.1021/ja01632a058
  5. ^ 5.0 5.1 Balakrishnan, V.K., Halasz, A. and Hawari, J., 2003. Alkaline hydrolysis of the cyclic nitramine explosives RDX, HMX, and CL-20: New insights into degradation pathways obtained by the observation of novel intermediates. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(9), pp.1838-1843. doi: 10.1021/es020959h
  6. ^ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 Hwang, S., Felt, D.R., Bouwer, E.J., Brooks, M.C., Larson, S.L. and Davis, J.L., 2006. Remediation of RDX-contaminated water using alkaline hydrolysis. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(2), pp.256-262. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:2(256)
  7. ^ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 Heilmann, H.M., Wiesmann, U. and Stenstrom, M.K., 1996. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of high explosives RDX and HMX in aqueous solution and adsorbed to activated carbon. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(5), pp.1485-1492. doi: 10.1021/es9504101 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "" defined multiple times with different content
  8. ^ Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Davis, J.L. and Larson, S.L., 2007. Potential for biodegradation of the alkaline hydrolysis end products of TNT and RDX (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-25). Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg, MS. Report.pdf
  9. ^ Kenyon, W.O. and Gray, H.L., 1936. The Alkaline Decomposition of Cellulose Nitrate. I. Quantitative Studies1. Journal of The American Chemical Society, 58(8), pp.1422-1427. doi: 10.1021/ja01299a034
  10. ^ Kim, B.J., Alleman, J.E. and Quivey, D.M., 1998. Alkaline hydrolysis/biodegradation of nitrocellulose fines (No. CERL-TR-98/65). Consstruction Engineering Researcg Lab (ARMY) Champaign, IL. Report.pdf
  11. ^ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Emmrich, M., 1999. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene in aqueous solution and highly contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(21), pp.3802-3805. doi: 10.1021/es9903227
  12. ^ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Hwang, S., Ruff, T.J., Bouwer, E.J., Larson, S.L. and Davis, J.L., 2005. Applicability of alkaline hydrolysis for remediation of TNT-contaminated water. Water research, 39(18), pp.4503-4511. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.008
  13. ^ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Santiago, L., Felt, D.R. and Davis, J.L., 2007. Chemical Remediation of an Ordnance-Related Compound: The Alkaline Hydrolysis of CL-20. Environmental Quality Technology Program (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-18). Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS Environmental Lab. Report.pdf
  14. ^ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Larson, S.L., Davis, J.L., Martin, W.A., Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Brandon, D.L., Fabian, G. and O'Connor, G., 2007. Grenade Range Management Using Lime for Metals Immobilization and Explosives Transformation Treatability Study (No. ERDC/EL-TR-07-5). Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Report.pdf
  15. ^ Emmrich, M., 2001. Kinetics of the alkaline hydrolysis of important nitroaromatic co-contaminants of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene in highly contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(5), pp.874-877. doi: 10.1021/es0014990 doi: 10.1021/es0014990
  16. ^ Martin, W.A., Felt, D.R., Nestler, C.C., Fabian, G., O’Connor, G. and Larson, S.L., 2012. Hydrated Lime for Metal Immobilization and Explosives Transformation: Field Demonstration. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 17(3), pp.237-244. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000176
  17. ^ Breit, V.S., Mayer, E.H. and Carmichael, J.D., 1979, January. An easily applied black oil model of caustic waterflooding. In SPE California Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/7999-MS
  18. ^ DeZabala, E.F., Vislocky, J.M., Rubin, E. and Radke, C.J., 1982. A chemical theory for linear alkaline flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 22(02), pp.245-258. [https://doi.org/10.2118/8997-PA doi: 10.2118/8997-PA
  19. ^ Somerton, W. H., and C. J. Radke. 1980. Roles of clays in the enhanced recovery of petroleum. Proceedings of the first joint SPE/DOE symposium on enhance oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers
  20. ^ Smith, C.J., Peoples, M.B., Keerthisinghe, G., James, T.R., Garden, D.L. and Tuomi, S.S., 1994. Effect of surface applications of lime, gypsum and phosphogypsum on the alleviating of surface and subsurface acidity in a soil under pasture. Soil Research, 32(5), pp.995-1008. doi: 10.1071/SR9940995


See Also