User:Debra Tabron/sandbox
| REGULATORY AGENCY | DESCRIPTION | PFOS | PFOA | PFBS | PFBA | PFNA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRINKING WATER (µG/L) | |||||||||||
| U.S. EPA | Drinking Water Health Advisories | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||
| Health Canada | Drinking Water Screening Values | 0.6 | 0.2 | 15 | 30 | 0.2 | |||||
| Main Department of Environmental Protection | Maximum Exposure Guideline | 0.1 | |||||||||
| Michigan Department of Environmental Quality | Drinking Water Surface Water Quality Value | 0.011 | 0.42 | ||||||||
| New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection | Preliminary Health-Based Guidance Value | 0.04 | |||||||||
| New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection | Development of MCL Recommendations for PFOA and PFOS are Currently in Progress | 0.04 | |||||||||
| New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection | Health-Based Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) Recommendation | 0.013 | |||||||||
| Vermont Department of Health | Drinking Water Health Advisory Level | 0.02 | |||||||||
| GROUNDWATER (µG/L) | |||||||||||
| Minnesota Department of Health | Health Risk Limit for Groundwater | 0.3 | 0.3 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
| Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | Provisional Groundwater Remediation Objectives, Class I Groundwater | 0.2 | 0.4 | ||||||||
| Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | Provisional Groundwater Remediation Objectives, Class II Groundwater | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||
| North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration | 1.0 | |||||||||
| New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection | Interim Specific Ground Water Quality Criterion | 0.01 | |||||||||
| Maine Department of Environmental Protection | Remedial Action Guidelines for Residential Groundwater | 0.06 | 0.1 | ||||||||
| Michigan Department of Environmental Quality | Groundwater Residential Generic Cleanup Criteria and Screening Levels | 0.12 | 0.089 | ||||||||
| Michigan Department of Environmental Quality | Groundwater Nonresidential Generic Cleanup Criteria and Screening Levels | 0.5 | 0.28 | ||||||||
| Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Risk Reduction Program | Protective Concentration Levels for 16 PFASs for Several Different Exposure Scenarios | ||||||||||
| SOIL (MG/KG) | |||||||||||
| U.S. EPA Region 4 | Residential Soil Screening Level | 6 | 16 | ||||||||
| Minnesota Pollution Control Agency | Industrial Soil Reference Value (.xlsx) | 14 | 13 | 500 | |||||||
| Minnesota Pollution Control Agency | Residential Soil Reference Value(.xlsx) | 2.1 | 2.1 | 77 | |||||||
| Minnesota Pollution Control Agency | Recreational Soil Reference Value(.xlsx) | 2.6 | 2.5 | 95 | |||||||
| Maine Department of Environmental Protection | Remedial Action Guidelines for different exposure scenarios | 11-82 | |||||||||
| Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Risk Reduction Program | Protective Concentration Levels for 16 PFASs for Several Different Exposure Scenarios | ||||||||||
Table 2. Summary of PFAS Regulatory Criteria
Regulatory criteria for PFAS are still evolving relatively quickly. Please check the hyperlinked reference to confirm that the regulatory criteria listed in the table are up to date before using this information. Some states have PFAS regulatory values for groundwater as a result of consent agreements (e.g., both West Virginia and Ohio signed a consent agreement with DuPont listing 0.4 µg/L as a precautionary site-specific action level for PFOA). Other states (e.g., Delaware, New Hampshire, New York) have adopted U.S. EPA provisional health advisory levels for PFOS and PFOA in several water systems. Pennsylvania has investigated PFOS contamination associated with two contaminated wells identified through EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule program. Alabama has also addressed PFAS contamination on a site-specific basis. Alaska has conducted sampling and monitoring for PFAS at multiple sites.
