File list

Jump to: navigation, search

This special page shows all uploaded files.

File list
 
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page
Date Name Thumbnail Size User Description Versions
13:58, 4 January 2019 WH Picture13.PNG (file) 2.09 MB Admin   1
13:58, 4 January 2019 WH Picture12.PNG (file) 5.43 MB Admin   1
13:58, 4 January 2019 WH Picture11.PNG (file) 3.89 MB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture10.PNG (file) 692 KB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture9.PNG (file) 2.16 MB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture8.PNG (file) 5.54 MB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture7.PNG (file) 7.75 MB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture6.PNG (file) 649 KB Admin   1
13:57, 4 January 2019 WH Picture5.PNG (file) 1.9 MB Admin   1
13:56, 4 January 2019 WH Picture4.PNG (file) 1.1 MB Admin   1
13:56, 4 January 2019 WH Picture3.PNG (file) 1.07 MB Admin   1
13:56, 4 January 2019 WH Picture2.PNG (file) 4.05 MB Admin   1
13:56, 4 January 2019 WH Picture1.PNG (file) 4.45 MB Admin   1
17:25, 17 December 2018 Base Add Design Tool - Dec 2018.xlsx (file) 105 KB Admin   1
09:32, 11 December 2018 Base Add Design Tool - August 2018.xlsx (file) 83 KB Admin   1
10:26, 6 December 2018 Emulsion Design Tool Dec08.xls (file) 1.32 MB Admin   1
10:25, 6 December 2018 ER-0626-Emulsion Users Guide.pdf (file) 1.05 MB Admin   1
10:24, 6 December 2018 Emulsion Design Tool Readme.pdf (file) 17 KB Admin   1
11:29, 15 November 2018 EOS in the subsurface.gif (file) 18.46 MB Debra Tabron   1
16:18, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig4.png (file) 28 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4. Effect of volume scaling factor (SFV) and mass scaling factor (SFM) on volume contact efficiency for a moderately heterogeneous aquifer with well spacing approximately equal to row spacing (Borden et al., 2008). 1
16:10, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig3.png (file) 329 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3. EVO mixed in field during early pilot test. 1
15:57, 13 November 2018 Rules of thumb for negatively charged emulsions.PNG (file) 15 KB Debra Tabron - rapid flocculation 0 mV < zeta potential < -5 mV - incipient instability -10 mV < zeta potential < -30 mV - moderate stability -30 mV < zeta potential < -40 mV - good stability -40 mV < zeta potential < -60 m... 1
15:09, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig2.png (file) 132 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2. animation illustrating oil droplet transport and retention in porous media. 1
15:01, 13 November 2018 Borden3w2 Fig1.PNG (file) 210 KB Debra Tabron Figure 1. Photo-micrograph of EVO (0.7 µm median diameter). White scale bar 25 µm. 1
13:53, 12 November 2018 2008-Borden-Development of a design tool for injections.pdf (file) 900 KB Debra Tabron Borden, R.C., Clayton, M., Weispfenning, A.M., Simpkin, T. and Lieberman, M.T., 2008. Development of a Design Tool for Planning Aqueous Amendment Injection Systems. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, Arlington, Virginia. ESTCP P... 1
13:58, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup tech for UST Sites.pdf (file) 219 KB Debra Tabron U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2017. How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Corrective Action Plan Reviewers, Chapter V: Landfarming. , Land and Emergency Management 5401R, EPA 51... 1
13:57, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2003-Landfarming-OSC-Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes.pdf (file) 883 KB Debra Tabron U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2003. Aerobic Biodegradation of Oily Wastes: A Field Guidance Book for Federal On-scene Coordinators, Version 1.0, October 2003. Region 6 South Central Response and Prevention Branch 1
13:54, 9 November 2018 USEPA-2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas exploration and Production Wastes....pdf (file) 1,010 KB Debra Tabron U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002. Exemption of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Wastes from Federal Hazardous Waste Regulations. Office of Solid Waste, EPA530-K-01-004. 1
13:51, 9 November 2018 USEPA-1993. bio using land treatment.pdf (file) 2.01 MB Debra Tabron U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1993. Bioremediation Using the Land Treatment Concept. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. 1
13:48, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig9.png (file) 101 KB Debra Tabron Figure 9: Chromatogram Change illustrating a crude oil degradation with initial API gravity > 30 (week 0, 3, 7, and 15) 1
13:47, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig8.png (file) 81 KB Debra Tabron   1
13:45, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig7.PNG (file) 320 KB Debra Tabron Typical Landfarming Operation 1
13:44, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig6b.png (file) 22 KB Debra Tabron Chromatogram of weathered crude oil 1
13:43, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig6a.png (file) 30 KB Debra Tabron Figure 6a: Chromatogram of fresh crude oil 1
13:42, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig5.png (file) 15 KB Debra Tabron Figure 5. Correlation between API gravity (specific weight of the crude) and the predicted extent of biodegradation as measured by oil and grease (O&G) (McMillen et al., 2004[5]) 1
13:40, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig4.png (file) 799 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4: Rotovator and Plows to till soils 1
13:39, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig3.png (file) 359 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3: Water truck to ensure optimal moisture content for microbial degradation in soils. 1
13:39, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig2.png (file) 617 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2: Excavator to move soils 1
13:36, 9 November 2018 Kamath1w2 Fig1.png (file) 318 KB Debra Tabron Figure 1: Soils undergoing treatment at a Landfarming Facility 1
13:38, 19 October 2018 Denham pH buffering Fig3c.PNG (file) 35 KB Jhurley   1
13:37, 19 October 2018 Denham pH buffering Fig3.PNG (file) 35 KB Jhurley corrected units 5
11:35, 19 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig1.png (file) 1.47 MB Debra Tabron   1
14:15, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig7.png (file) 35 KB Debra Tabron Figure 7. Required base addition for PRB for different target pH values. 1
14:14, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig6.png (file) 16 KB Debra Tabron Figure 6. Fraction of H2CO3 not ionized (α) versus pH. 1
14:13, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig5.png (file) 59 KB Debra Tabron Figure 5. Aquifer buffering capacity (pHBC) from multiple ERD sites 1
14:11, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig4.png (file) 61 KB Debra Tabron Figure 4. Buffering capacity of aquifer solids from SA-17 and OU-2 measured in DI water<ref name = "Borden2017EVO"/>. The legend shows depth below ground surface in feet for individual samples. 1
14:10, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig3.png (file) 33 KB Debra Tabron Figure 3. Distribution of H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>*, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup> as a function of pH. 1
14:07, 17 October 2018 Borden2w2Fig2.png (file) 20 KB Debra Tabron Figure 2. Cumulative frequency distribution of groundwater pH measurements at site in eastern North Carolina where soil pH is approximately 5. 1
12:14, 20 September 2018 2006-USEPA-Wadeable Streams Assessment.pdf (file) 13.43 MB Debra Tabron US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nation’s Streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Office of Water, Washington DC 2046 1
13:54, 19 September 2018 1999-Barbour-Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers.pdf (file) 3.94 MB Debra Tabron Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second edition. EPA 841-B-99-02. U.S. Environmental Protection A... 1
First pagePrevious pageNext pageLast page